For web-development teachers

Grade student web projects, beautifully.

Stop reviewing HTML, CSS, and JavaScript homework over your students' shoulders. Share a link, let them upload their project, then read the code, run it live, and grade it — with an AI second opinion.

Students need no account · HTML · CSS · JavaScript

index.html

▾ project

index.html

style.css

script.js

▸ img

<h1>Hello world</h1>

.btn {

background: #c1fbd4;

}

Pass ✓
Built forCoding bootcamps·Web-dev courses·Independent instructors·After-school programs
How it works

From shared link to final verdict.

01

Create & share a link

Write the brief, generate one link, and drop it in your class chat. No setup for students.

02

Students upload their work

They open the link, add their name, and upload a folder, files, or a .zip — images and all.

03

Review, preview & grade

Read every file, run the project live, get an AI review, and mark it pass or fail with feedback.

The review workspace

A real editor, in the browser.

Open any submission into a VS Code-style workspace — the full project tree, syntax highlighting, and inline image preview. Nothing to download, nothing to install.

  • Browse every file and folder they submitted
  • Monaco editor with real syntax highlighting
  • Images and media render right inline

index.html

style.css

script.js

▸ img/

function init() {

document.querySelector(

".btn"

)

}

preview

My Portfolio

Front-end assignment · week 4

View work
Live preview

Run their code. Instantly.

One click renders their index.htmlwith its CSS, JavaScript, and images — in a sandboxed frame that can't touch your account. See exactly what the student built.

  • Relative paths, images, and scripts all resolve
  • Opaque-origin sandbox keeps your session safe
  • Refresh to re-run after you read the code
AI code review

An AI second opinion, on tap.

Hit one button and get a structured, beginner-friendly review of the submission — what's done well, the bugs, and concrete suggestions. Bring your own Grok or Groq key; it runs only when you ask.

  • Strengths, issues, and a suggested verdict
  • References the exact files and code
  • On-demand, so your API spend stays in control
AI review · grok

Summary

Clean, semantic HTML and a responsive layout. A couple of accessibility and JS issues to address.

Issues & bugs

Suggested verdict: Pass

Everything in one place

Built for the way you actually teach.

Folder & zip uploads

Whole project trees, media included — the wrapper folder and junk files are handled for you.

VS Code-style editor

Monaco-powered editor with a real file tree, syntax highlighting, and image preview.

Sandboxed live preview

Run student index.html safely in an isolated frame — their code never touches your session.

AI code review

An instant, structured critique of each submission powered by Grok / Groq.

Co-teachers

Invite other instructors from the admin panel; everyone grades from one place.

Private by default

Submissions live in private storage; previews are sandboxed and isolated.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Do students need an account?+

No. They open the link you share, enter a name and email, and upload — that's the whole flow.

What can students upload?+

A whole project folder, individual files, or a .zip. HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, fonts, and small media are all supported.

How does the live preview work?+

Their index.html runs inside a sandboxed iframe with an opaque origin, so the code renders exactly as built but can never reach your teacher session.

Which AI powers the review?+

Any OpenAI-compatible model — xAI Grok or Groq. You bring your own key and pick the model; reviews run on demand so spend stays predictable.

Can I add other teachers?+

Yes. Admins create co-teacher accounts from the admin panel, and each new teacher is emailed their sign-in details.

Start grading the better way.

Create your first assignment in under a minute. Your students just need the link.